home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20041116-20060924
/
000292_dold@XReXXsecur.usenet.us.com_Thu Mar 30 12:51:59 2006.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2020-01-01
|
2KB
Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!newsfeed.nyu.edu!newsfeed.arcor.de!noris.net!newsfeed.hanau.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!postnews.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!gail.ripco.com!wasp.rahul.net!192.160.13.20.MISMATCH!rahul.net!azure.rahul.net!dold
From: dold@XReXXsecur.usenet.us.com
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: secure ftp - tls with ckermit client
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 01:00:10 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: "a2i network"
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <e0a1qq$3eb$1@blue.rahul.net>
References: <dvvju1$8cb$1@blue.rahul.net> <slrne286k3.isr.fdc@sesame.cc.columbia.edu> <e01bb8$edb$1@blue.rahul.net> <slrne2gbvp.rtc.fdc@sesame.cc.columbia.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: azure.rahul.net
X-Trace: blue.rahul.net 1143507610 3531 192.160.13.38 (28 Mar 2006 01:00:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: support@rahul.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 01:00:10 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.9-34.EL (i686))
X-Comment: Encoded From: line allows replies that preserve original subject
Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:15546
Frank da Cruz <fdc@columbia.edu> wrote:
> Today I uploaded Dev.17, which has three new targets for Linux:
> linux+krb5+ssl
> linux+ssl
> linux+krb5
> These work, at least in Red Hat AS4.3. Hopefully other combinations can
> be modeled on these entries, which do it "right" -- they just set the bare
> minimum KFLAGS and LIBS items and then chain to the main Linux entry, which
> figures out all the rest.
> http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/ckdaily.html
These new ones and more all build on my CentOS platform.
I haven't actually tested any of them.
It would be helpful for the makefile to contain some history.
If each makefile entry had a date alongside it, one could make some guesses
about which had superceeded another. For instance, I think that on
2006-03-27, linux+ssl is preferred to redhat21+ssl, and much preferred over
linux+openssl, which is old.
Lacking some chronological clue, I might think that the more items listed,
the better, so linux+openssl+zlib+shadow+pam would look best for my current
installation.
--
---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8,-122.5